Worldwide Alternatives to Pesticides and Fertilizers

Lilykosmick
Green Answers

There is a common myth that genetically modified crops are more effective at feeding large populations. Yet there is just no evidence that GM crops are more effective than organic crops at yielding large harvests. GM crops are certainly not more sustainable or safer, so why is there an undercurrent of support for using these crops in developing countries?

One of the main justifications behind genetically modifying organisms is their potential to supposedly end world hunger. The appeal behind such a claim is obvious; GMOs will end world hunger.  Not only has this claim been proven untrue, there is no evidence that organic farming can’t do the same.  Since GMO technology first came to be in the 1970s the world has not seen an end to its hunger problems. In fact, the World Health Organization states that today hunger is the single gravest threat to the world’s public health.

Read More: Worldwide Alternatives to Pesticides and Fertilizers

This entry was posted in GMO, Headlines, Health Related, Permaculture & Horticulture and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply